Artificial Intelligence was heralded as the ultimate solution for modernizing Human Resources. The promise was a faster, more efficient, and unbiased hiring process. However, as industry leaders are discovering, the reality is far more complex. In a recent podcast episode, host Charles, co-host Evan Reiss, and guest Daniel Fricker, a global leader in HR technology, explored the paradox of AI in recruitment: sometimes, making things faster just makes them less efficient.

The core issue, as Fricker notes, is that while AI should theoretically create efficiency, it’s often causing “entropy”—making the system more chaotic.

The AI Firehose: Drowning in a Sea of Resumes

One of the most immediate problems is the sheer volume of applications. AI tools have made it incredibly easy for candidates to apply for hundreds, or even thousands, of jobs. This has created a floodgate problem for recruiters.

• According to LinkedIn data cited by Fricker, the average number of submissions per job opening has surged from around 110 in early 2024 to 250 more recently.
• This has led to a frustrating experience for job seekers, with the response rate for applicants dropping to less than 4%.
• This breakdown in communication can have real business consequences. Fricker referenced a Harvard Business Review case study on Starbucks, which found that applicants were also major customers. A poor hiring experience led them to stop buying coffee, impacting the bottom line.

Faced with this deluge, recruiters are forced to rely even more heavily on AI to filter candidates, which introduces its own set of flaws.

The Flawed Filter: Algorithmic Bias and Technical Glitches

Trusting an algorithm to sort through thousands of resumes is fraught with peril. The podcast highlighted several ways these systems can fail:

1. Technical Misinterpretation: AI resume parsers often make critical errors. Fricker has seen systems that can’t distinguish between different roles within the same company, flagging a loyal, promoted employee as a “job hopper” with multiple six-month stints. This can incorrectly generate a red flag on an excellent candidate.
   
2. Algorithmic Bias: AI learns from historical data, and if that data contains human bias, the AI will amplify it exponentially. The hosts pointed to infamous examples:
   
   • A job recruiter algorithm that reportedly found the two biggest indicators of job performance were having the name “Jared” and playing high school lacrosse.
   • Amazon’s experimental hiring tool that penalized resumes containing the word “women’s,” as it had learned from a male-dominated dataset.

As Fricker notes, you cannot simply “kerplunk” an AI tool into an organization and expect it to work perfectly without human oversight and fine-tuning.

“I would challenge you to think of any AI tool that you can kerplunk right now into any organization and go hands off. It’s more like you kerplunk it in. And then you need to kind of dial it in on the feedback of, you know, functional team leads and everything else.”

Beyond the Resume: The Move Towards Skills-Based Hiring

The conversation suggests that the traditional resume is becoming “antiquated”. The future of talent acquisition lies in a skills-based approach. Instead of relying on inconsistent job titles, forward-thinking companies are using AI to identify and quantify the specific skills a candidate possesses.

This involves looking for evidence of skills like “public speaking” not by searching for the term, but by identifying activities like hosting podcasts or publishing articles and then assigning a score. Companies are even using predictive analytics to determine the skills they will need in six to twelve months and incorporating that into their current job searches.

The Path Forward: Adaptation is Key

So, what is the solution? The consensus is that technology alone isn’t the answer. The responsibility falls on both companies and applicants to adapt.

For applicants, the “Easy Apply” button is a trap. The candidates who succeed are the ones who put in the extra effort, writing tailored cover letters and providing portfolios that showcase their work. In a broken system, people are finding ways around it; employee referrals now account for a staggering 40% of hires.

For companies, the stakes are incredibly high. A McKinsey report suggests that 75% of jobs will be impacted by AI, and businesses that fail to fully integrate AI into their functions by 2030 will likely be out of business.

Ultimately, success requires a holistic approach. It demands that HR departments move away from a purely “people and culture angle” and adopt a more scientific, experimental mindset. It requires collaboration between technical teams, functional managers, and HR to build a system that works.

The key takeaway from the discussion is a single, powerful word: adaptation. AI is not a magic wand; it is a powerful, and sometimes chaotic, tool that must be managed with diligence, foresight, and a focus on the human experience.

---

To hear more insights from Alejandro Mainetto, watch the full video episode on YouTube or subscribe to the podcast.

• Watch on YouTube: https://youtu.be/zJFisPxc6hg?si=uvp5HAN1-GYztZgy 
• Subscribe to The Digital Impact Podcast: https://rss.com/podcasts/the-digital-impact-business-tech-and-ai/

New episodes are released every Friday.